Anti-Trump Judges Hit Hard by Groundbreaking Bill

• CLICK HERE: Sign up for ’s daily U.S. politics newsletter
• PODCAST: Get the latest news and rumors direct from inside the White House - Tune into Welcome to MAGAland here.

nationwide injunctions issued by federal district judges that affect all Americans might become a thing of the past following a bill advanced by republicans to support the trump administration.

The House approved the 'No Rogue Rulings Act' on Tuesday with a vote of 219 to 213. The legislation will now move to the Republican-controlled Senate, where it is anticipated to be enacted.

This legislation limits federal district courts from granting nation-wide injunctions unless specific conditions apply, with the intention of preventing judicial halts to President Trump’s policy initiatives.

"These unconventional judicial decisions represent a fresh form of opposition to the Trump administration, marking the first instance where judges wearing robes have deemed it essential to engage in politics at such scale," stated Representative Darrell Issa, R-Calif., who authored the bill, earlier this week.

The federal judiciary is not merely interpreting the law; it is obstructing the presidency. In reality, it does not maintain equality with the other branches of government but views itself as superior.

It was of utmost importance for Republicans to handle Congress As they assert, 'Rouge' judges were unfairly limiting the president's power.

"We aim to stop activist judges from handing down these unconstitutional nationwide injunctions and making laws from the bench, an issue that has grown quite significant," stated the Speaker. Mike Johnson said Tuesday.

Trump has been frustrated by judges across the country from Washington, D.C., to San Francisco for ruling against his deportation and DOGE orders. The president even took the unprecedented step of calling for one judge's removal.

"This judge, much like numerous corrupt ones I've had to face, ought to be impeached!" Trump stated regarding Washington, D.C. Judge James Boasberg, who suspended the president’s immigration enforcement initiatives.

Rulings from Judge Boasberg, along with many other jurists nationwide, caused Trump's deportation plans to grind to a halt.

Once this legislation is signed by Trump, which is anticipated, the judges' decisions may well be confined to specific issues. This would enable the president to exercise his authority without concern for nationwide injunctions hindering his policy initiatives.

"We do hold jurisdiction over the federal courts," Johnson stated while discussing the bill lately.

'We have the option to abolish an entire district court,' he pointed out.

We do hold sway over the court's finances and various other aspects. However, extreme circumstances may necessitate radical actions, Congress is going to act.'

His comment seemed like an oblique hint, if not a subtle warning, suggesting that Congress possesses the authority to reorganize and cut funding for courts nationwide.

Though the Supreme Court The supreme judicial authority in the nation, along with district courts that have consistently overturned White House executive actions through their nationwide decrees, falls under congressional oversight.

The president has requested that D.C. District Court Judge James Boasberg be impeached for issuing an order halting the administration’s deportations of Venezuelan individuals under the Alien Enemies Act.

The president has similarly criticized district Judge John James McConnell Jr., who ruled in favor of 22 states and the District of Columbia to restore the distribution of federal grants and loans that the administration had halted as they reviewed expenditures related to DOGE.

Republican legislators have already submitted articles of impeachment against McConnell and an additional judge from Maryland-based jurisdiction. Theodore Chuang, who recently determined that disbanding USAID is against the Constitution.

Impeachment seems improbable since it would necessitate backing from Democrats.

According to Article III of the Constitution, it falls upon Congress to 'ordain and establish' the courts below the Supreme Court. This implies that legislators are responsible for providing funding and structuring the organization of these lower courts.